There is a new banking policy discussion happening in Nigeria right now, and if you follow how banks operate, invest, or even just use bank apps every day, this is something you should pay attention to because it could quietly change how big banks are structured in the country.
A research and investment firm, Zrosk Investment Management, has raised concerns about new reforms being proposed by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). These reforms are focused on how banking groups are structured under what is called the Financial Holding Company (HoldCo) system.
If you are following other financial and opportunity updates, you may also want to read our earlier posts on NHF refund application in Nigeria and skills incubation programmes for Nigerian artisans, as they explain related government and institutional systems affecting finance, housing, and skills development.
Now, to make this simple, many of Nigeria’s biggest banks like Access Bank, UBA, GTCO, First HoldCo, and Stanbic IBTC don’t just operate as single banks anymore. They operate like groups. That means one main company controls the bank, insurance businesses, investment arms, and sometimes fintech or asset management companies under one structure. That structure is called a HoldCo.
What the CBN is now trying to do is change the rules for how these HoldCos operate, how much capital they must hold, and how tightly connected their different businesses can be.
According to Zrosk, these new rules could force banks to raise more money, restructure how they are organised, and in some cases completely adjust how their subsidiaries are arranged across different countries.
One of the biggest concerns is capital requirement. The new proposal suggests that HoldCo companies must keep more capital than they currently do. Specifically, they may be required to hold about 20 percent more capital than the total value of all their subsidiaries combined.
In simple terms, it means banks may need to bring in more money to remain compliant. Zrosk estimates that this could create a combined capital gap of about N370 billion across major Nigerian banking groups.
Some banks will feel this more than others. Access Holdings may need the highest adjustment, followed by GTCO and First HoldCo, while Stanbic IBTC may have a smaller gap. This does not mean the banks are weak, but it means the rules are becoming stricter.
The firm also pointed out that this change could keep happening every time banks raise new capital in the future. So as banks grow, their capital requirements at the HoldCo level will also increase, creating a continuous pressure cycle.
Another major part of the proposed rules is structural reform. The CBN is reportedly planning to make it mandatory for some financial groups to formally operate under a HoldCo structure if they control multiple related financial businesses.
This is important because it could force banks like Zenith Bank and UBA to reorganise how their companies are structured, especially if they own different financial services businesses under one umbrella.
Zrosk explained that this is not optional under the draft rules. The language used suggests that affected institutions “must” comply, meaning banks may not have the choice to continue operating in their current structure if the policy is fully enforced.
At the same time, the report also suggests that this restructuring may not be entirely negative in the long run. For example, it could actually help some banks unlock hidden value by making it easier to separate and list subsidiaries, or clearly show how each part of the business is performing.
But the short-term impact could be heavy, because restructuring a large banking group is not simple. It involves legal approvals, tax implications, foreign exchange issues, and coordination across different countries where these banks operate.
Another major concern raised is about foreign subsidiaries. Many Nigerian banks currently own banks in other African countries and even in the UK, but these foreign operations are usually held under the Nigerian bank entity.
The new proposal suggests that these foreign subsidiaries may need to be moved under the HoldCo structure instead. That sounds simple, but in reality, it could be very complex because each country has its own banking regulations, approvals, and tax rules.
Banks would need approval from multiple regulators across different countries, and in some cases, transferring ownership could trigger tax charges or legal complications.
The report also highlights something that could affect customers indirectly. Under the new rules, customers may need to go through fresh onboarding processes when being referred between different companies within the same banking group.
For example, if you move from a bank account to an insurance or investment product within the same group, you may need to repeat certain verification steps again. This could make banking less smooth for customers compared to the current system where everything is integrated.
There is also a concern about technology systems. The draft rules appear to both allow shared technology systems within groups and also restrict reliance on shared infrastructure for transaction processing. This creates confusion and could force banks to duplicate systems, which would increase costs.
Zrosk believes that while these reforms are aimed at reducing risk and improving oversight in the banking system, they could also increase operating costs for banks and reduce efficiency in how financial groups operate.
However, the report also makes an important point that despite all these changes, the situation is not likely to create a systemic crisis in the banking sector. In other words, banks are not at risk of collapsing because of this. Instead, they may just need to adjust how they operate.
One of the key ideas behind the CBN’s proposal is control and stability. The regulator wants to make sure that parent companies do not have too much influence over subsidiaries and that each part of a financial group operates more independently.
This is why the proposal includes restrictions like preventing HoldCo companies from interfering in daily banking operations or forcing subsidiaries to make certain business decisions.
It also introduces ownership rules requiring HoldCos to maintain at least 51 percent ownership of their subsidiaries, while ensuring that all dealings between group companies are done fairly and at arm’s length.
There are also stricter rules around directors, limiting how many boards one person can sit on within a banking group.
So in all, what is happening here is a major restructuring of how big financial institutions in Nigeria are allowed to operate.
On one side, the regulator is trying to reduce risk, improve transparency, and prevent financial contagion if one part of a banking group runs into trouble.
On the other side, banks are looking at higher capital requirements, more compliance pressure, and potentially expensive restructuring.
For everyday Nigerians, the changes may not be immediately visible, but over time they could affect how banking services are delivered, how fast digital services work, and how integrated financial products feel across banking groups.
At this stage, the policy is still in draft form and open for review. That means banks, analysts, and other stakeholders are still discussing it with the CBN before final decisions are made.
What happens next will depend on how much of the proposal is adopted in its current form and how banks respond to it.
But one thing is clear. Nigeria’s banking system is heading toward a more tightly regulated and structured environment, and the biggest players in the industry may soon have to adjust how they operate behind the scenes.
For now, this is one of those developments that looks technical on the surface, but has long-term implications for how money moves, how banks grow, and how the financial system is controlled in Nigeria.
Kindly share this post…